Git merge green -m "R4 merge branch 'green' into 'red'" sleep 1 git merge blue -m "R5 merge branch 'blue' into 'red'" sleep 1 echo "red" > red git add -A git commit -m "R6" sleep 1 git -no-pager log -oneline -graph -date-orderĪ diagram of the current Git commit history is shown below. On the other hand, it is not possible to run a rebase during a cherry-pick, meaning: if both rebase-merge/ and sequencer/ exist or CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and REBASE_HEAD point to the same commit, we still want to advise to use git cherry-pick -skip.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27Įcho "init" > init git add -A git commit -m "init commit" sleep 1 git checkout -b redĮcho "red" > red git add -A git commit -m "R1" sleep 1 git branch greenĮcho "red" > red git add -A git commit -m "R2" sleep 1 git checkout blueĮcho "blue" > blue git add -A git commit -m "B1" sleep 1 git checkout greenĮcho "green" > green git add -A git commit -m "G1" sleep 1 echo "green" > green git add -A git commit -m "G2" sleep 1 git checkout blueĮcho "blue" > blue git add -A git commit -m "B2" sleep 1 git checkout redĮcho "red" > red git add -A git commit -m "R3" sleep 1 git checkout greenĮcho "green" > green git add -A git commit -m "G3" sleep 1 git checkout blueĮcho "blue" > blue git add -A git commit -m "B3" sleep 1 git checkout red in an exec line in an interactive rebase). Note: we take pains to handle the situation when a user runs a git cherry-pick during a rebase. While at it, we adjust more places in builtin/commit.c that incorrectly assumed that the presence of a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD meant that surely this must be a cherry-pick in progress. Let's suggest the correct command, even during a rebase. However, it was overlooked that there are more conditions than just a git cherry-pick when this advice is printed (which originally suggested the neutral git reset): the same can happen during a rebase.
In dcb500dc16c (" cherry-pick/revert: advise using -skip",, Git v2.23.0-rc0 - merge listed in batch #6), git commit learned to suggest to run git cherry-pick -skip when trying to cherry-pick an empty patch. (Merged by Junio C Hamano - gitster - in commit f085189, ) commit: give correct advice for empty commit during a rebase See commit 430b75f, commit 901ba7b, commit 8d57f75, commit 21b11c6, commit f028d66, commit 780308d () by Phillip Wood ( phillipwood). See commit 5b7a64d () by Johannes Schindelin ( dscho). The mechanism to prevent " git commit" from making an empty commit or amending during an interrupted cherry-pick was broken during the rewrite of " git rebase" in C, which has been corrected with Git 2.27 (Q2 2020). You will see: Otherwise, please use 'git cherry-pick -skip So instead of seeing: Otherwise, please use 'git reset
Git cherry pick commit sha update#
Update the advice messages, to tell users about this less This is more annoying and sometimes confusing on the users' part.Īdd a -skip option to make skipping commits easier for the user and to make the commands more consistent.
Git am or rebase have a -skip flag to skip the current commit if theĭuring a cherry-pick or revert a user could likewise skip a commit, but needs to use ' git reset' (or in the case of conflicts ' git reset -merge'), followed by ' git ( cherry-pick | revert) -continue' to skip the commit. (Merged by Junio C Hamano - gitster - in commit d97c62c, ) cherry-pick/revert: add -skip option See commit dcb500d, commit de81ca3, commit 265ab48, commit 918d1e6, commit 6a1f904 () by Rohit Ashiwal ( r1walz). So in your case: git cherry-pick -skip on C. With Git 2.23 (Q3 2019), " git cherry-pick/revert" learned a new " -skip" action.
0 kommentar(er)
